First Paper Assignment Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

First Paper Assignment - Essay ExampleThus, the thesis of this musical composition can be put like this Killing in struggle is seriously morally wrong, because it is brute(a) and worthless deprivation of the most valuable one has which is human life. A number of analytical and mental researches have been conducted on the reasons, causes, and consequences of one of group of people butchering other group of people during contend time. However, much(prenominal) appalling facts as raping and killing women and children are shocking evidence of human worst weaknesses and absence slightest responsibility for the most severe crimes. Contemplating on such problematic issue of human life as war, I would go as far as to claim that we do non need war and have to learn to live without it. Killing enemies in war, soldiers become automated machines of mass destruction which neer stop even before helpless crying child (Calhoun 40). If ones psychology is so complex that in war they do not distinguish their aims and enemies from helpless women and little children, then they should not engage themselves in war at all. Today, we are witnesses of revolutions and overthrowing of national leaders in the Islamic countries such as Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya. One of the major claims the Colonel Qaddafis son has recently made proves the leaders interests in power and his philosophy that the end justifies the means We will fight until the last man, until the last woman, until the last smoke (Kirkpatrick).War politics is often based on the assumption that killing combatants in war is self-defending act. It is concluded that war and killing are acceptable. Fighting and killing for ones country, family, rights is considered to be even honorable. Soldiers are too human beings with their rights to life. Therefore, killing is deliberate deprivation of human life (White 414). In such a grasp of logical arguments, it would be reasonable to conclude that end does not justify means. T here is a command which became commonplace during war times kill or be killed. If to look at this statement from religious perspective, to be killed is honorable, while to kill is not. Furthermore, a person who is forced to kill like a soldier whose duty is to kill, will always have some psychological trauma or, at least, negative images in their mind related to killing and dead bodies of their enemies. Killing in war is similar to some carnal instinct for surviving. Hence, any inclination to kill even as a duty in wartime is a rudiment of our ancestors who lived as tribes in caves fighting with their human and non-human enemies for survival. It is neither right nor just to divide soldiers into abominable and not guilty, because they are all the same. They are employed by someone else to do a repellant job which is to kill during a war. Killing then is called carrying out of mission a very deferential job, one might think. If to assume that killing is self-defense, many combat ants are killed of another reason, which is their enemys duty, to kill (White, 415). Therefore, all the war actions which involve intentional deprivation of someone elses life cannot be morally excusable, because in most if not all cases it is murder. Killing in war should be looked at from a perspective of immorality of war itself. Duties and responsibilities of a soldier are to be thoroughly looked through and reconsidered. Fullinwider right states that killing is