Word Reappropriation Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Word Reappropriation - Assignment ExampleIt was tho an innocent devise that conveyed just that message of something odd or unusual. This was the normal meaning for the word until about a century ago. plainly queer began to be the disparagement for homosexuals and lesbians since then (Irvine, Martha).How do some words and nouns change meaning They say, it is all in the mind. The mind is the source of all things, good and grim. You accept what is good and leave digression the things that are not so nice. However, socio-political or socio-economical situation does not pay homage to such(prenominal) august acceptances or rejections. These words become outright evil in the minds of people and they are so do by with abomination and hatred that it becomes another synonym for the devil himself. Otherwise, why would they generate caution and circumspection to such an extent that their usage begins to draw ire and consequencesFor example, the marks REDSKINS and REDSKINETTES as applied to football entertainment services, and MOONIES as applied to a doll that exposes its buttocks, have been criticized as disparaging Native Americans and religious followers of the nuclear fusion reaction Church, respectively. But in each of these examples, the applicant seeking trademark protection was not a constituent of the disparaged separate rather, the applicant was a nonmember, attaching a historic slur to a product targeted toward the general national (Anten, Todd).Hence, as a rule of thumb, it is generally accepted that when a word associated disparagingly with a group is put forward for something serious like legal clearance for registration, such words are counted as being derisive of a group, it may be any group, and these words have to be expunged. But the question arises. Why must these words be expunged What is wrong in them They are not bad words. These words express a meaning. They may sound derisive to some. But they are understood to yield for something that may be noble. They need not stand for the gospel truth when they are mistook for something that may resist from their original meaning.We all know what is bitch. The word has evolved to an extent that is exists in an out-of-shape form. I readily interpret that a bitch is an odious woman. Yes, that is bitch It is that woman I do not care about. She is a bitch You tell her anything she will believe. She is a dirty woman So she is a bitch. Unacceptable as this word has become, it is bandied about in all hue and shape with chivalrous regularity. The word may be synonymous with infamy. But its reach has scaled dizzying levels. One may not feel overwhelmed or ashamed(predicate) when it is associated with none other than Hillary Rodham Clinton (Zeisler, Andi).This sounds hilarious as well as hegemonic. The same group that is using a word for an international figure has also discarded the original meaning for bitch. Call it a she-dog. Do not call her a bitch. The bite in the word bitch ha s turned so nasty that it has assassinated its original owner.Word misappropriationWord re-appropriation goes hand in hand with word misappropriation. Not that it is intended to be misappropriated. But the process of gradual re-appropriation has